AWQ vs GGUF (Q4_K_M): VRAM, Quality and Speed

Q4_K_M uses about 14% more memory than AWQ / GPTQ 4-bit (4.85 vs 4.25 bits per weight). On Qwen 3 32B with an 8K context that is 21.4 GB versus 19.1 GB. Pick by runtime, not by quality.

Updated October 14, 2026 ยท Sizes calculated from each model's config.json, see methodology

VRAM on popular models

Total memory with an 8K context and FP16 KV cache. The last column is the smallest standard VRAM size that holds each version.

ModelAWQ / GPTQ 4-bitQ4_K_MDifferenceSmallest tier
Llama 3.1 8B5.8 GB6.3 GB+0.6 GB8 GB / 8 GB
Qwen 3.5 9B5.8 GB6.4 GB+0.6 GB8 GB / 8 GB
Qwen 3 14B9.4 GB10.5 GB+1.0 GB12 GB / 12 GB
Mistral Small 3.1 24B14.0 GB15.6 GB+1.7 GB16 GB / 20 GB
Qwen 3.6 27B15.0 GB16.9 GB+1.9 GB16 GB / 20 GB
Gemma 4 31B17.7 GB19.8 GB+2.1 GB20 GB / 24 GB
Qwen 3 32B19.1 GB21.4 GB+2.3 GB24 GB / 24 GB
Qwen 3.6 35B-A3B18.5 GB21.0 GB+2.4 GB20 GB / 24 GB
Llama 3.3 70B38.3 GB43.2 GB+4.9 GB48 GB / 48 GB
Qwen 3.5 122B-A10B61.7 GB70.2 GB+8.5 GB80 GB / 80 GB

Largest model each VRAM size can run

The biggest model released since 2025 that fits fully at 8K context.

Context you can fit

Longer contexts need room for the KV cache. The longest context that fits fully at each format, with an FP16 cache:

ModelGPUAWQ / GPTQ 4-bitQ4_K_M
Qwen 3 14B16 GB40K37K
Qwen 3.6 27B24 GB128K98K
Qwen 3 32B24 GB21K12K
Gemma 4 31B32 GB166K139K
Llama 3.3 70B48 GB29K14K

Download size

File sizes in decimal GB, as Hugging Face shows them. Use the GGUF size calculator for any other model.

ModelAWQ / GPTQ 4-bitQ4_K_M
Llama 3.1 8B4.3 GB4.9 GB
Qwen 3 14B7.9 GB9.0 GB
Qwen 3.6 27B14.3 GB16.3 GB
Qwen 3 32B17.4 GB19.9 GB
Llama 3.3 70B37.5 GB42.8 GB

Quality

AWQ and GPTQ are 4-bit GPU formats for vLLM, SGLang and Transformers, at about 4.25 bits per weight including scales. GGUF Q4_K_M, used by llama.cpp, Ollama and LM Studio, averages about 4.85 bits because it keeps some tensors at higher precision. Quality is similar; Q4_K_M is often slightly ahead because of those extra bits.

Speed

Text generation reads every weight once per token, so smaller formats generate faster on the same GPU. Estimated on an RTX 4090 24GB:

ModelAWQ / GPTQ 4-bitQ4_K_M
Llama 3.1 8B~131 tok/s~117 tok/s
Qwen 3 32B~35 tok/s~31 tok/s

Verdict

Pick by runtime, not by quality. AWQ or GPTQ suits vLLM and batched serving on NVIDIA GPUs, where they are fast and memory-efficient. GGUF suits single-user local use, Macs, AMD and Intel GPUs, and partial CPU offload, which AWQ does not support.

Frequently asked questions

Is AWQ faster than GGUF?

For batched serving in vLLM, usually yes. For a single user on one GPU, llama.cpp with Q4_K_M is competitive, and it is the only one of the two that can offload layers to system RAM.

Can Ollama run AWQ models?

No. Ollama and LM Studio use GGUF (LM Studio also supports MLX on Macs). Use vLLM, SGLang or Transformers for AWQ and GPTQ.

How much more VRAM does Q4_K_M need than AWQ / GPTQ 4-bit?

About 14% more for the weights (4.85 vs 4.25 bits per weight). For Qwen 3 32B with an 8K context that is 21.4 GB versus 19.1 GB.

Related